Jonah Shepherd was born in Yorkshire but in the late 1850s moved with wife Alice and daughter Jane to Germany. They were still in Germany in 1872 when Jane married. However, around 1873, Jane and her new German husband moved, first to London and then to Northumberland, after which their lives are well-documented. Jonah’s German-born son, Christopher, is also to be found in Northumberland, in records from 1881 onwards. But Jonah and Alice seem to disappear. The only (online) indication that Jonah may have returned to England is several death records in Northumberland in 1889.
Bearing in mind that the last positive placing of Jonah was 17 years earlier in Germany, my only reason for thinking he may be in Northumberland is that his adult children are there. The search is complicated by the fact that the series of death records I see are all in the same year but in different places: Tynemouth, Killingworth, Longbenton. Could any of these be the man I was looking for, and if so, which one?
The answer is that they are all correct. Killingworth (St John) is the church where Jonah was buried. Before 1837 (pre-civil BMDs) the parish would have been the only place where his death (burial) was recorded. But since 1837 the death is officially recorded at the relevant Registration District, and in this case that was Tynemouth. Longbenton was the actual place of death given on public online trees by other people researching this family, but without further information I still couldn’t be sure this was my man. Hoping that a known family member would be recorded as the informant, I sent for the death certificate, and I was in luck: Jonah’s son Christopher registered the death. But I had another surprise too: Jonah actually died in yet another place: Dudley, which falls within the Longbenton sub-Registration District (where the death was actually registered), the Killingworth ecclesiastical parish and the Tynemouth Registration District!
One person, one death, four places of death; and all of them correct, depending on the focus of the record.
You may be absolutely certain that your ancestors lived in Village ‘X’, but the actual parish may be centred on an adjacent village ‘Y’, and it is here that, prior to 1837, the main BMB (Baptism, Marriage, Burial) record will be recorded. Of course, even after 1837, people were still baptised, married and buried in churches, so you’ll still need to be aware of the connection between your ancestor’s abode and the nearest parish. However, any such religious rites will now form a (very useful!) secondary record: since 1837 the introduction of civil BMDs means that the official record of all Births, Marriages and Deaths will be under the Registration District within which the event took place.
So which place should we record? I record them all, but in slightly different places. This is how I do it:
For civil birth and death registrations after 1837:
I copy the information directly from the General Register Office website. I then paste this into the notes section of the birth or death event on that person’s profile page, amending it by inserting the word ‘age’ for deaths, and the phrase ‘mother’s maiden name’ for births. So this is what it says for Jonah:
SHEPHARD, JONAH, age 60. GRO Reference: 1889 M Quarter in TYNEMOUTH Volume 10B Page 147
However, if I do buy the certificate or if, through any other means (e.g. cemetery record, family documents), I know the actual residence at time of birth/death, I record that as the person’s place of birth/death. For Jonah this is ‘Dudley’, or ‘Dudley, Longbenton’.
These generate a new event relating to a religious rite:
- a baptism, which is not the same as the birth,
- a marriage (plus banns),
- a burial, which is not the same as death.
- (Note: If you’re lucky, the vicar will also have recorded the actual date of birth or death, and you can insert these into the appropriate place on your ancestor’s profile.)
For these BMBs, I record the place where the event took place, and below that, in the event notes, I record any other information to be found on the relevant record. For example:
Joseph Lucas was baptised at Mill Hill Chapel in Leeds in 1754. That’s the place I record on the baptism event, and it would be tempting to record ‘Leeds’ as place of birth. However, the record itself reads: ‘Joseph ye son of Nathaniel Lucas and Sarah, of Woodhouse’. I transcribe this and add it to the notes for the baptism. This now also becomes evidence for Joseph’s actual place of birth, which is not Leeds as the baptism record set might have us believe, but Woodhouse (now very much part of Leeds, but in 1754 this was a separate village). Woodhouse and Leeds are less than a mile apart, and some might think this is splitting hairs, but having this exact place of birth information for Joseph helped me solve a mystery relating to his origins and later apprenticeship and marriage.
All this applies whether the parish record is dated before or after 1837. After that year you might use a combination of these parish and civil records to end up with several places, as I did with Jonah, but the basic fact remains that they can all be separated out:
- Joseph’s place of birth was Woodhouse, and his place of baptism was Leeds, Mill Hill Chapel.
- Jonah’s place of death was ‘Dudley’ or ‘Dudley, Longbenton’, his place of burial was Killingworth Saint John, Northumberland, and his death was officially recorded at Tynemouth.
In my next post I’ll share some really useful online resources to help you find parishes and Registration Districts, and to work out their boundaries.
Pingback: Finding Registration Districts and Parishes | English Ancestors